Kershaw Intermediate School
610 East 3rd North Sugar City ID, 83448, Madison County Phone: 208-356-0241 Ranking: (117 out of 489, top 24%)* Type: Regular Middle School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 4 to Grade 6 School District: Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 16 | 16 | 15 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 17 | |||||||
Total Students: | 357 | 346 | 336 | 328 | 336 | 349 | 329 | |||||||
Grade 4: | 112 | 31.4% | 96 | 27.7% | 124 | 36.9% | 107 | 32.6% | 96 | 28.6% | 120 | 34.4% | 114 | 34.7% |
Grade 5: | 105 | 29.4% | 136 | 39.3% | 103 | 30.7% | 101 | 30.8% | 117 | 34.8% | 121 | 34.7% | 106 | 32.2% |
Grade 6: | 140 | 39.2% | 114 | 32.9% | 109 | 32.4% | 120 | 36.6% | 123 | 36.6% | 108 | 30.9% | 109 | 33.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 169 | 47.3% | 179 | 51.7% | 180 | 53.6% | 169 | 51.5% | 161 | 47.9% | 163 | 46.7% | 155 | 47.1% |
Female: | 188 | 52.7% | 167 | 48.3% | 156 | 46.4% | 159 | 48.5% | 167 | 49.7% | 178 | 51.0% | 170 | 51.7% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.9% |
Hispanic: | 28 | 7.8% | 22 | 6.4% | 33 | 9.8% | 27 | 8.2% | 23 | 6.8% | 21 | 6.0% | 19 | 5.8% |
Black: | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.6% |
White: | 326 | 91.3% | 319 | 92.2% | 294 | 87.5% | 295 | 89.9% | 310 | 92.3% | 327 | 93.7% | 305 | 92.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 111 | 31.1% | 123 | 35.5% | 142 | 42.3% | 117 | 35.7% | 124 | 36.9% | 109 | 31.2% | 85 | 25.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 71 | 19.9% | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.6% | 80 | 24.4% | 69 | 20.5% | 72 | 20.6% | 68 | 20.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 22.90 | 22.27 | 22.40 | 16.82 | 19.21 | 19.00 | 19.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ISAT | ||||||
2008 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 79.8% | 77.6% |
2009 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 79.7% | 80.4% |
2010 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 83.7% | 81.9% |
2011 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 81.1% |
2012 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 89.5% | 84.8% |
2013 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.5% | 83.2% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 85.9% | 84.2% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 85.6% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 84.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 83.4% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 87.1% | 86.8% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.7% | 86.1% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 91.2% | 82.5% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 86.3% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.7% | 86.2% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 88.9% | 86.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 88.9% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 93.7% | 89.7% |
2008 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 75.2% | 74.2% |
2009 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 81.9% | 77.2% |
2010 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 82.2% | 77.2% |
2011 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 78.7% |
2012 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 78.5% | 79.4% |
2013 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 80.1% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 83.2% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 86.9% | 77.9% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 79.8% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 80.9% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 78.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | 79.2% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86.1% | 84.3% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 86.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 88% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.7% | 88.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89.3% | 87.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 88.5% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 72.3% | 60.1% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 70.5% | 66.4% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 69.5% | 64.9% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 78.8% | 67.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 73.8% | 69.3% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 83.5% | 72.2% |
2008 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 89.7% | 71.7% |
2009 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.6% | 73.7% |
2010 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 75.1% |
2011 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 84.3% | 75.4% |
2012 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | 76.5% |
2013 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 78.3% | 73.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 77.1% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.5% | 78.2% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 94.5% | 79.2% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 77.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 87.4% | 77.8% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 81.6% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 85.7% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | 85.8% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 88.4% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 89.5% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 88.2% | 86.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 92.9% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | NA |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 12.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 21.4% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 78.6% |
Mean Base Salary: | $37,503.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $30,000.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $39,549.0 |
* Kershaw Intermediate School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.